Paper detail

Hydrogen Impurity in Yttria: \textit{Ab-Initio} Study by Semi-Local and Hybrid Functionals

A study based on density functional theory calculations was performed for the three charge states of interstitial hydrogen in Yttria. The present calculations were carried out by employing the GGA-PBE and the HSE06 exchange-correlation functional. It is observed that the ground state H$^0$ and H$^-$ configurations are similar in behaviour; these prefer to relax in the O vacant site, with limited structural relaxation. For the neutral and the negative charged systems more two different geometrical configurations occur with higher energies, which evidence the existence of metastable sites of H in the Yttria lattice. The H$^+$ equilibrium state is found only when a strong bond between the impurity ion and an anion, O-H bond of $\sim$1 Å, is formed. The formation energy of the interstitial impurity is studied, for which amphoteric behaviour is found for this defect and for the ground state structures. These results evidence that hydrogen counteracts the prevailing conductivity of the host lattice, thus passivating any existing electrical levels originated from other doping sources. To compare results with non-equilibrium and short time-scale $μ$SR measurements, the formation energy of the higher energy configurations were also evaluated. For the Bond O geometrical site, H evidences a donor-dopant behaviour, hence enabling the coexistence of donor behaviour with the ground-state amphoteric behaviour. From the density of states results, and for the H$^0$ and H$^-$ charge states, a defect level was observed in the band gap. For the ground state Vacant O configuration and the metastable Interstitial structure the defect level was found to be slightly above the valence band maximum, hence indicating no dopant-donor character for the Yttria material. But, for the Bond O, local-minimum, configuration, the defect level is located above the middle of the band gap, closer the conduction band.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.