Paper detail

Hydrodynamic Limits and Clausius inequality for Isothermal Non-linear Elastodynamics with Boundary Tension

We consider a chain of particles connected by an-harmonic springs, with a boundary force (tension) acting on the last particle, while the first particle is kept pinned at a point. The particles are in contact with stochastic heat baths, whose action on the dynamics conserves the volume and the momentum, while energy is exchanged with the heat baths in such way that, in equilibrium, the system is at a given temperature $T$. We study the space empirical profiles of volume stretch and momentum under hyperbolic rescaling of space and time as the size of the system growth to be infinite, with the boundary tension changing slowly in the macroscopic time scale. We prove that the probability distributions of these profiles concentrate on $L^2$-valued weak solutions of the isothermal Euler equations (i.e. the non-linear wave equation, also called p-system), satisfying the boundary conditions imposed by the microscopic dynamics. Furthermore, the weak solutions obtained satisfy the Clausius inequality between the work done by the boundary force and the change of the total free energy in the system. This result includes the shock regime of the system.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.