Paper detail

Hydrodynamic description of Non-Equilibrium Radiation

Non-equilibrium radiation is addressed theoretically by means of a stochastic lattice-gas model. We consider a resonating transmission line composed of a chain of radiation resonators, each at a local equilibrium, whose boundaries are in thermal contact with two blackbody reservoirs at different temperatures. In the long chain limit, the stationary state of the non-equilibrium radiation is obtained in a closed form. The corresponding spectral energy density departs from the Planck expression, yet it obeys a useful scaling form. A macroscopic fluctuating hydrodynamic limit is obtained leading to a Langevin equation whose transport parameters are calculated. In this macroscopic limit, we identify a local temperature which characterises the spectral energy density. The generality of our approach is discussed and applications for the interaction of non-equilibrium radiation with matter are suggested.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.