Paper detail

Hubbard-$U$ corrected Hamiltonians for non-self-consistent random-phase approximation total-energy calculations: A study of ZnS, TiO$_2$, and NiO

In non-self-consistent calculations of the total energy within the random-phase approximation (RPA) for electronic correlation, it is necessary to choose a single-particle Hamiltonian whose solutions are used to construct the electronic density and non-interacting response function. Here we investigate the effect of including a Hubbard-$U$ term in this single-particle Hamiltonian, to better describe the on-site correlation of 3$d$ electrons in the transition metal compounds ZnS, TiO$_2$ and NiO. We find that the RPA lattice constants are essentially independent of $U$, despite large changes in the underlying electronic structure. We further demonstrate that the non-self-consistent RPA total energies of these materials have minima at nonzero $U$. Our RPA calculations find the rutile phase of TiO$_2$ to be more stable than anatase independent of $U$, a result which is consistent with experiments and qualitatively different to that found from calculations employing $U$-corrected (semi)local functionals. However we also find that the +$U$ term cannot be used to correct the RPA's poor description of the heat of formation of NiO.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.