Paper detail

Hubbard U and Hund's Exchange J in Transition Metal Oxides: Screening vs. Localization Trends from Constrained Random Phase Approximation

In this work, we address the question of calculating the local effective Coulomb interaction matrix in materials with strong electronic Coulomb interactions from first principles. To this purpose, we implement the constrained random phase approximation (cRPA) into a density functional code within the linearized augmented plane wave (LAPW) framework. We apply our approach to the 3d and 4d early transition metal oxides SrMO3 (M=V, Cr, Mn) and (M=Nb, Mo, Tc) in their paramagnetic phases. For these systems, we explicitly assess the differences between two physically motivated low-energy Hamiltonians: The first is the three-orbital model comprising the t2g states only, that is often used for early transition metal oxides. The second choice is a model where both, metal d- and oxygen p-states are retained in the construction of Wannier functions, but the Hubbard interactions are applied to the d-states only ("d-dp Hamiltonian"). Interestingly, since -- for a given compound -- both U and J depend on the choice of the model, so do their trends within a family of these compounds. In the 3d perovskite series SrMO3 the effective Coulomb interactions in the t2g Hamiltonian decrease along the series, due to the more efficient screening. The inverse -- generally expected -- trend, increasing interactions with increasing atomic number, is however recovered within the more localized "d-dp Hamiltonian". Similar conclusions are established in the layered 4d perovskites series Sr2MO4 (M=Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh). Compared to their isoelectronic and isostructural 3d analogues, the 4d 113 perovskite oxides SrMO3 (M=Nb, Mo, Tc) exhibit weaker screening effects. Interestingly, this leads to an effectively larger U on 4d shells than on 3d when a t2g model is constructed.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.