Paper detail

HPV and cervical cancer in Moldova, epidemiological model with intervention cost vs benefit and effectiveness analysis

Human papillomavirus, or HPV, is a sexually transmittable virus infection, which is necessary risk factor for developing cervical cancer, first most common type of cancer in working age women in Moldova. We observe both behavioral change (sexuality increase) and demographical change (population ageing). We used data since 1998 (Moldovan peace treaty) to adjust model parameter and we project till around 2030 (for vaccination till 2050). According to provided information, interdisciplinary model was proposed. It iss set of deterministic differential equations. Stochasticity was introduced in sexual partner change rates. The model has aggregated the most important paths of infection, cancer development and prevention scenarios (more than 100 equations and 200 parameters). Moldovan cervical cancer perspective looks much better, than in central western Europe countries, because of relatively young society. In our setup, obligatory vaccination seems to not be so crucial (for none of realistic scenarios increase of cancer cases is possible) for public health, as in most countries in European Union. However, screening practice could be verified in terms of efficiency, when cost benefit calculation would be done. We propose more optimal screening guidelines (with prevention cost 5 -10k EUR per QALY), which could provide saving perspective in 10-15 year in range 150-300k EUR yearly. Targeted vaccination could be also consider, because costs are similar to high frequencies screening schema with the same cancer cases projection. However, some positive side effects of vaccination as reduction of pathogen circulation in society, will cause decrease of other pathologies related to HPV like genital warts and other cancer.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.