Paper detail

How Universal is the SFR - H2 Relation?

It is a well established empirical fact that the surface density of the star formation rate, Sigma_SFR, strongly correlates with the surface density of molecular hydrogen, Sigma_H2, at least when averaged over large (~kpc) scales. Much less is known, however, if (and how) the Sigma_SFR-Sigma_H2 relation depends on environmental parameters, such as the metallicity or the UV radiation field in the interstellar medium (ISM). Furthermore, observations indicate that the scatter in the Sigma_SFR-Sigma_H2 relation increases rapidly with decreasing averaging scale. How the scale-dependent scatter is generated and how one recovers a tight ~ kpc scale Sigma_SFR-Sigma_H2 relation in the first place is still largely debated. Here, these questions are explored with hydrodynamical simulations that follow the formation and destruction of H2, include radiative transfer of UV radiation, and resolve the ISM on ~60 pc scales. We find that within the considered range of H2 surface densities (10-100 Msun/pc^2) the Sigma_SFR-Sigma_H2 relation is steeper in environments of low metallicity and/or high radiation fields (compared to the Galaxy), that the star formation rate at a given H2 surface density is larger, and the scatter is increased. Deviations from a "universal" Sigma_SFR-Sigma_H2 relation should be particularly relevant for high redshift galaxies or for low-metallicity dwarfs at z~0. We also find that the use of time-averaged SFRs produces a large, scale dependent scatter in the Sigma_SFR-Sigma_H2 relation. Given the plethora of observational data expected from upcoming surveys such as ALMA the scale-scatter relation may indeed become a valuable tool for determining the physical mechanisms connecting star formation and H2 formation.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.