Paper detail

How to quantify and avoid finite size effects in computational studies of crystal nucleation: The case of homogeneous crystal nucleation

Finite size artifacts arise in molecular simulations of nucleation when critical nuclei are too close to their periodic images. A rigorous determination of what constitutes too close is, however, a major challenge. Recently, we devised rigorous heuristics for detecting such artifacts based on our investigation of how system size impacts the rate of heterogeneous ice nucleation (Hussain, Haji-Akbari, \emph{J. Chem. Phys.} \textbf{154}, 014108, \textbf{2021}). We identified the prevalence of critical nuclei spanning across the periodic boundary, and the thermodynamic and structural properties of the liquid occupying the inter-image region as indicators of finite size artifacts. Here, we further probe the performance of such heuristics by examining the dependence of homogeneous crystal nucleation rates in the Lennard-Jones liquid on system size. The rates depend non-monotonically on system size and vary by almost six orders of magnitude for the range of system sizes considered here. We confirm that the prevalence of spanning critical nuclei is the primary indicator of finite size artifacts and almost fully explains the observed variations in rate. Proximity, or structuring of the inter-image liquid, however, is not as strong of an indicator due to the fragmented nature of crystalline nuclei. As a result, the dependence of rate on system size is subtle for the systems with a minuscule fraction of spanning critical nuclei. These observations indicate that our heuristics are universally applicable to different modes of nucleation (homogeneous and heterogeneous) in different systems even if they might be overly stringent for homogeneous nucleation,~e.g.,~in the LJ system.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.