Paper detail

How to estimate the number of self-avoiding walks over 10^100? Use random walks

Counting the number of N-step self-avoiding walks (SAWs) on a lattice is one of the most difficult problems of enumerative combinatorics. Once we give up calculating the exact number of them, however, we have a chance to apply powerful computational methods of statistical mechanics to this problem. In this paper, we develop a statistical enumeration method for SAWs using the multicanonical Monte Carlo method. A key part of this method is to expand the configuration space of SAWs to random walks, the exact number of which is known. Using this method, we estimate a number of N-step SAWs on a square lattice, c_N, up to N=256. The value of c_256 is 5.6(1)*10^108 (the number in the parentheses is the statistical error of the last digit) and this is larger than one googol (10^100).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.