Paper detail

How the diffuse Universe cools

In this work we investigate the cooling channels of diffuse gas (i.e. n_H<0.1 cm^-3) in cosmology. We aim to identify the wavelengths where most of the energy is radiated in the form of emission lines or continuum radiation, and the main elements and ions responsible for the emission. We use a subset of cosmological, hydrodynamical runs from the OWLS project to calculate the emission of diffuse gas and its evolution with time. We find that at z=0 (z=2) about 70 (80) per cent of the energy emitted by diffuse gas is carried by emission lines, with the continuum radiation contributing the remainder. Hydrogen lines in the Lyman series are the primary contributors to the line emission, with a share of 16 (20) per cent. Oxygen lines are the main metal contributors at high redshift, while silicon, carbon and iron lines are strongest at low redshift, when the contributions of AGB stars and supernova Ia explosions to the metal budget become important and when there is more hot gas. The ionic species carrying the most energy are OIII, CII, CIII, SiII, SiIII, FeII and SIII. The great majority of energy is emitted in the UV band (lambda=100-4000 A), both as continuum radiation and line emission. With almost no exception, all the strongest lines fall in this band. At high energies, continuum radiation is dominant (e.g., 80 per cent in the X-ray band), while lines contribute progressively more at lower energies. While the results do depend on the details of the numerical implementation of the physical processes modelled in the simulations, the comparison of results from different simulations demonstrates that the variations are overall small, and that the conclusions are fairly robust. Given the overwhelming importance of UV emission for the cooling of diffuse gas, it is desirable to build instruments dedicated to the detection and characterisation of diffuse UV emission.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.