Paper detail

How stable are transport model results to changes of resonance parameters? A UrQMD model study

The Ultrarelativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics [UrQMD] model is widely used to simulate heavy ion collisions in broad energy ranges. It consists of various components to implement the different physical processes underlying the transport approach. A major building block are the shared tables of constants, implementing the baryon masses and widths. Unfortunately, many of these input parameters are not well known experimentally. In view of the upcoming physics program at FAIR, it is therefore of fundamental interest to explore the stability of the model results when these parameters are varied. We perform a systematic variation of particle masses and widths within the limits proposed by the particle data group (or up to 10%). We find that the model results do only weakly depend on the variation of these input parameters. Thus, we conclude that the present implementation is stable with respect to the modification of not yet well specified particle parameters.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.