Paper detail

How relativistic heavy ion collisions can help us understand the universe

We discuss the anthropic principle and its implications for our existence and the physical laws which govern the universe. Several amazing coincidences which provide conditions necessary for creation of life suggest that the "laws of nature" are not uniquely determined. The idea that our universe is only one among a multitude of universes with different physical laws, as predicted by the theory of chaotic cosmic inflation, provides a logically simple, but speculative resolution of the anthropic principle. An important insight of modern quantum field theory is that the physical laws are not only determined by symmetry principles, but also by the nature of the vacuum state. Experiments involving collisions of relativistic heavy ions provide the clearest tests of the hypothesis that properties of particles and forces can be modified by a change in the vacuum state. We outline the goals of these experiments and briefly review their current status.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.