Paper detail

How Many Iterations are Sufficient for Semiparametric Estimation?

A common practice in obtaining a semiparametric efficient estimate is through iteratively maximizing the (penalized) log-likelihood w.r.t. its Euclidean parameter and functional nuisance parameter via Newton-Raphson algorithm. The purpose of this paper is to provide a formula in calculating the minimal number of iterations $k^\ast$ needed to produce an efficient estimate $\hatθ_n^{(k^\ast)}$ from a theoretical point of view. We discover that (a) $k^\ast$ depends on the convergence rates of the initial estimate and nuisance estimate; (b) more than $k^\ast$ iterations, i.e., $k$, will only improve the higher order asymptotic efficiency of $\hatθ_n^{(k)}$; (c) $k^\ast$ iterations are also sufficient for recovering the estimation sparsity in high dimensional data. These general conclusions hold, in particular, when the nuisance parameter is not estimable at root-n rate, and apply to semiparametric models estimated under various regularizations, e.g., kernel or penalized estimation. This paper provides a first general theoretical justification for the "one-/two-step iteration" phenomena observed in the literature, and may be useful in reducing the bootstrap computational cost for the semiparametric models.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.