Paper detail

How many bots are you following?

Social Media are evolving as a pervasive source of news able to reach a larger audience through their spreading power. The main drawback is given by the presence of malicious accounts, known as social bots, which are often used to diffuse misleading information. Social bots are automated accounts whose goal is to interact with humans and influence them. Starting from the definition of credulous (i.e., human accounts with a high percentage of bot friends among their followees, in this work we aim to single out a regression model to derive, with an acceptable margin of error, the percentage of bot-followees of a human-operated account. The advantage lies in knowing, as a preventive measure, which users may be the target of bots' activities, hence more exposed to the misleading/unreliable content. Our results showed that the best regression model achieves a Mean Absolute Error of 3.62% and a Root Mean Squared Error of 5.96%, thus encouraging further research in this direction.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.