Paper detail

How Far Should We Look Back to Achieve Effective Real-Time Time-Series Anomaly Detection?

Anomaly detection is the process of identifying unexpected events or ab-normalities in data, and it has been applied in many different areas such as system monitoring, fraud detection, healthcare, intrusion detection, etc. Providing real-time, lightweight, and proactive anomaly detection for time series with neither human intervention nor domain knowledge could be highly valuable since it reduces human effort and enables appropriate countermeasures to be undertaken before a disastrous event occurs. To our knowledge, RePAD (Real-time Proactive Anomaly Detection algorithm) is a generic approach with all above-mentioned features. To achieve real-time and lightweight detection, RePAD utilizes Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) to detect whether or not each upcoming data point is anomalous based on short-term historical data points. However, it is unclear that how different amounts of historical data points affect the performance of RePAD. Therefore, in this paper, we investigate the impact of different amounts of historical data on RePAD by introducing a set of performance metrics that cover novel detection accuracy measures, time efficiency, readiness, and resource consumption, etc. Empirical experiments based on real-world time series datasets are conducted to evaluate RePAD in different scenarios, and the experimental results are presented and discussed.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.