Paper detail

How far can we trust climate change predictions?

Current techniques for predicting climate change are mainly based on "massive" deterministic numerical modeling. However, the ocean-atmosphere system is a so-called "complex system", made up of a large number of interacting elements. We show that, in such systems, owing to the particularly large sensitivity to initial conditions, the approach of a possible tipping over a critical point cannot be evidenced "by construction" using numerical modeling, due to the divergence of computation time in the vicinity of the tipping point. On the other hand, the increasing amplitudes of observed climatic instabilities seem to be an obvious sign of the approach of such a tipping point, easily interpreted as a "critical softening", well known in the theory of dynamical systems, that would bring us irreversibly into a new and totally unexplored equilibrium state, except for a significantly higher temperature and in a much closer time than expected from numerical modeling extrapolations. Thus, maintaining climate warming around 1.5$^o$C or 2$^o$C by 2030 or 2050 appears fairly unrealistic unless worldwide drastic green house gases reduction measures are immediately taken and applied.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.