Paper detail

How do quarks and gluons lose energy in the QGP?

At RHIC, a suppression, $R_{AA}\approx 0.2$ relative to binary-scaling, for $π^0$ with $5\leq p_T\leq 20$ GeV/c was discovered in central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV, and surprisingly also for single-electrons from the decay of heavy quarks. Both these results have been confirmed in Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV. In this $p_T$ range, the LHC results for pions nearly overlap the RHIC results but the flatter spectrum at LHC implies that the energy loss in the medium must be $\sim 40$% larger than at RHIC. At LHC, the unique and beautiful measurement of the fractional transverse momentum imbalance $1-\langle{\hat{p}_{T_2}/\hat{p}_{T_1}}\rangle$ of di-jets in Pb+Pb collisions relative to p-p collisions, shows $\approx 15\%$ for jets with $120\leq\hat{p}_{T_1}\leq 360$ GeV/c. This is a much smaller fractional jet imbalance than the $\approx 45\%$ derived from two-particle correlations of di-jet fragments at RHIC corresponding to jet $\hat{p}_T\approx 10-20$ GeV/c. This presents a challenge to both theory and experiment for improved understanding. There are many other such unresolved issues, for instance, the absence of evidence for a $\hat{q}$ effect by observation of momentum transferred to the medium by outgoing partons. An implied hard scattering component for the soft physics multiplicity distributions in A+A collisions based on a popular formula, ${dN_{\rm ch}^{AA}/dη}= [(1-x) \langle{N_{\rm part}}\rangle {dN_{\rm ch}^{pp}/dη}/2 + x\, \langle{N_{\rm coll}}\rangle {dN_{\rm ch}^{pp}/dη}]$, seems to be an unphysical way to understand the deviation from $N_{\rm part}$ scaling. Based on recent p-p and d+A measurements, a more physical way is presented along with several other stimulating results and ideas from recent d+Au (p+Pb) measurements.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.