Paper detail

How Do Constraints of Nuclear Symmetry Energy Reconcile with Different Models?

By simultaneously describing the data of isospin sensitive nucleonic flow and pion observables, such as $v_2^n/v_2^{ch}$ and $π^-/π^+$, with ultra-relativistic quantum molecular dynamics (UrQMD) model, we got the symmetry energy at flow and pion characteristic densities which are $S(1.2ρ_0)=34\pm 4$ MeV and $S(1.5ρ_0)=36\pm 8$ MeV. Within the uncertainties, the constraints of symmetry energy at characteristic densities are consistent with the previous constraints by using other transport models. The consistency suggests that the reliable constraints on symmetry energy should be presented at the characteristic density of isospin sensitive observables. By using the constraints of symmetry energy at two different characteristic densities, the extrapolated value of $L$ is provided. Within $2σ$ uncertainty, the extrapolated value of $L$ is in $5-70$ MeV which is consistent with the recent combination analysis from PREX-II and astrophyiscs data. Further, the calculations with the constrained parameter sets can describe the data of charged pion multiplicities from S$π$RIT collaboration.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.