Paper detail

How did the Suicide Act and Speak Differently Online? Behavioral and Linguistic Features of China's Suicide Microblog Users

Background: Suicide issue is of great concern in China. Social media provides an active approach to understanding suicide individuals in terms of their behavior and language use. Aims: This study investigates how suicide Microblog users in China act and speak differently on social media from others. Methods: Hypothesis testing in behavioral and linguistic features was performed between a target group of 33 Chinese Microblog users who have committed suicide and a control group of 30 active users without suicidal ideation. Results: Suicide group significantly outnumbered control group in the extent of openly published posts and self-reference, and the intensity of using 7 word categories: negative words/social process words/cognitive process words/emotion process words/negative emotion words/exclusive words/physiological process words. Limitations: Information collection and confirmation of suicide users remain difficult. Conclusions: It is revealed that suicide people vary from others in certain behavioral and linguistic features in social media. This study fills the niche of suicide studies by noting specified indicators of suicide ideation for Chinese individuals online, providing insights of constructing an online alarm system for early detection and intervention of suicidal individuals.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.