Paper detail

How coordinate Bethe ansatz works for Inozemtsev model

Three decades ago, Inozemtsev found an isotropic long-range spin chain with elliptic pair potential that interpolates between the Heisenberg and Haldane-Shastry (HS) spin chains while admitting an exact solution throughout, based on a connection with the elliptic quantum Calogero-Sutherland model. Though Inozemtsev's spin chain is widely believed to be quantum integrable, the underlying algebraic reason for its exact solvability is not yet well understood. As a step in this direction we refine Inozemtsev's `extended coordinate Bethe ansatz' and clarify various aspects of the model's exact spectrum and its limits. We identify quasimomenta in terms of which the $M$-particle energy is close to being (functionally) additive, as one would expect from the limiting models; our expression is additive iff the energy of the elliptic Calogero-Sutherland system is so. This enables us to rewrite the energy and Bethe-ansatz equations on the elliptic curve, turning the spectral problem into a rational problem as might be expected for an isotropic spin chain. We treat the $M=2$ particle sector and its limits in detail. We identify an $S$-matrix that is independent of positions. We show that the Bethe-ansatz equations reduce to those of Heisenberg in one limit and give rise to the `motifs' of HS in the other limit. We show that, as the interpolation parameter changes, the `scattering states' from Heisenberg become Yangian highest-weight states for HS, while bound states become ($\mathfrak{sl}_2$-highest weight versions of) affine descendants of the magnons from $M=1$. For bound states we find a generalisation of the known equation for the `critical length' for the Heisenberg spin chain. We discuss completeness for $M=2$ by passing to the elliptic curve. Our review of the two-particle sectors of the Heisenberg and HS spin chains may be of independent interest.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.