Paper detail

How Complex Contagions Spread Quickly in the Preferential Attachment Model and Other Time-Evolving Networks

In this paper, we study the spreading speed of complex contagions in a social network. A $k$-complex contagion starts from a set of initially infected seeds such that any node with at least $k$ infected neighbors gets infected. Simple contagions, i.e., $k=1$, quickly spread to the entire network in small world graphs. However, fast spreading of complex contagions appears to be less likely and more delicate; the successful cases depend crucially on the network structure~\cite{G08,Ghasemiesfeh:2013:CCW}. Our main result shows that complex contagions can spread fast in a general family of time-evolving networks that includes the preferential attachment model~\cite{barabasi99emergence}. We prove that if the initial seeds are chosen as the oldest nodes in a network of this family, a $k$-complex contagion covers the entire network of $n$ nodes in $O(\log n)$ steps. We show that the choice of the initial seeds is crucial. If the initial seeds are uniformly randomly chosen in the PA model, even with a polynomial number of them, a complex contagion would stop prematurely. The oldest nodes in a preferential attachment model are likely to have high degrees. However, we remark that it is actually not the power law degree distribution per se that facilitates fast spreading of complex contagions, but rather the evolutionary graph structure of such models. Some members of the said family do not even have a power-law distribution. We also prove that complex contagions are fast in the copy model~\cite{KumarRaRa00}, a variant of the preferential attachment family. Finally, we prove that when a complex contagion starts from an arbitrary set of initial seeds on a general graph, determining if the number of infected vertices is above a given threshold is $\mathbf{P}$-complete. Thus, one cannot hope to categorize all the settings in which complex contagions percolate in a graph.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.