Paper detail

Hopf bifurcation with tetrahedral and octahedral symmetry

In the study of the periodic solutions of a $Γ$-equivariant dynamical system, the $H~\mathrm{mod}~K$ theorem gives all possible periodic solutions, based on group-theoretical aspects. By contrast, the equivariant Hopf theorem guarantees the existence of families of small-amplitude periodic solutions bifurcating from the origin for each $\mathbf{C}$-axial subgroup of $Γ\times\mathbb{S}^1$. In this article we compare the bifurcation of periodic solutions for generic differential equations equivariant under the full group of symmetries of the tetrahedron and the group of rotational symmetries of the cube. The two groups are the image of inequivalent representations of the symmetric group $S_4$. The possible spatial symmetries of bifurcating solutions are different, even though the two groups yield the same group of matrices $Γ\times\mathbb{S}^1$. The same group of matrices occurs again as the extension $Γ\times\mathbb{S}^1$ when $Γ$ is the full group of symmetries of the cube. For these three groups, while characterizing the Hopf bifurcation, we identify which periodic solution types, whose existence is guaranteed by the $H~\mathrm{mod}~K$ theorem, are obtainable by Hopf bifurcation from the origin.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.