Paper detail

Hole probabilities for finite and infinite Ginibre ensembles

We study the hole probabilities of the infinite Ginibre ensemble ${\mathcal X}_{\infty}$, a determinantal point process on the complex plane with the kernel $\mathbb K(z,w)= \frac{1}πe^{z\bar w-\frac{1}{2}|z|^2-\frac{1}{2}|w|^2}$ with respect to the Lebesgue measure on the complex plane. Let $U$ be an open subset of open unit disk $\mathbb D$ and ${\mathcal X}_{\infty}(rU)$ denote the number of points of ${\mathcal X}_{\infty}$ that fall in $rU$. Then, under some conditions on $U$, we show that $$ \lim_{r\to \infty}\frac{1}{r^4}\log\mathbb P[\mathcal X_{\infty}(rU)=0]=R_{\emptyset}-R_{U}, $$ where $\emptyset$ is the empty set and $$ R_U:=\inf_{μ\in \mathcal P(U^c)}\left\{\iint \log{\frac{1}{|z-w|}}dμ(z)dμ(w)+\int |z|^2dμ(z) \right\}, $$ $\mathcal P(U^c)$ is the space of all compactly supported probability measures with support in $U^c$. Using potential theory, we give an explicit formula for $R_U$, the minimum possible energy of a probability measure compactly supported on $U^c$ under logarithmic potential with a quadratic external field. Moreover, we calculate $R_U$ explicitly for some special sets like annulus, cardioid, ellipse, equilateral triangle and half disk.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.