Paper detail

Hölder continuity and injectivity of optimal maps

Consider transportation of one distribution of mass onto another, chosen to optimize the total expected cost, where cost per unit mass transported from x to y is given by a smooth function c(x,y). If the source density f^+(x) is bounded away from zero and infinity in an open region U' \subset R^n, and the target density f^-(y) is bounded away from zero and infinity on its support \cl V \subset R^n, which is strongly c-convex with respect to U', and the transportation cost c satisfies the A3w condition of Trudinger and Wang \cite{TrudingerWang07p}, we deduce local Hölder continuity and injectivity of the optimal map inside U' (so that the associated potential u belongs to C^{1,α}_{loc}(\U')). Here the exponent α>0 depends only on the dimension and the bounds on the densities, but not on c. Our result provides a crucial step in the low/interior regularity setting: in a sequel \cite{FigalliKimMcCann09p}, we use it to establish regularity of optimal maps with respect to the Riemannian distance squared on arbitrary products of spheres. Three key tools are introduced in the present paper. Namely, we first find a transformation that under A3w makes c-convex functions level-set convex (as was also obtained independently from us by Liu \cite{Liu09}). We then derive new Alexandrov type estimates for the level-set convex c-convex functions, and a topological lemma showing optimal maps do not mix interior with boundary. This topological lemma, which does not require A3w, is needed by Figalli and Loeper \cite{FigalliLoeper08p} to conclude continuity of optimal maps in two dimensions. In higher dimensions, if the densities f^\pm are Hölder continuous, our result permits continuous differentiability of the map inside U' (in fact, C^{2,α}_{loc} regularity of the associated potential) to be deduced from the work of Liu, Trudinger and Wang \cite{LiuTrudingerWang09p}.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.