Paper detail

Hochschild and cyclic Homologies with bounded poles

We show that the classical Hochschild homology and (periodic and negative) cyclic homology groups are representable in the category of motives with modulus. We do this by constructing Hochschild homology and (periodic and negative) cyclic homologies for modulus pairs. We show a modulus version of HKR theorem, that is, there exists an isomorphism between modulus Hochschild homology and modulus Kähler differentials for affine normal crossing modulus pairs. By using the representability of modulus Hodge sheaves in the category of motives with modulus, we construct an object of the category of motives with modulus which represents modulus Hochschild homology. Similarly, We compare modulus de Rham cohomology and modulus cyclic homologies and obtain a representability of modulus cyclic homologies.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.