Paper detail

Histopathological imaging features- versus molecular measurements-based cancer prognosis modeling

For most if not all cancers, prognosis is of significant importance, and extensive modeling research has been conducted. With the genetic nature of cancer, in the past two decades, multiple types of molecular data (such as gene expressions and DNA mutations) have been explored. More recently, histopathological imaging data, which is routinely collected in biopsy, has been shown as informative for modeling prognosis. In this study, using the TCGA LUAD and LUSC data as a showcase, we examine and compare modeling lung cancer overall survival using gene expressions versus histopathological imaging features. High-dimensional regularization methods are adopted for estimation and selection. Our analysis shows that gene expressions have slightly better prognostic performance. In addition, most of the gene expressions are found to be weakly correlated imaging features. It is expected that this study can provide some insight into utilizing the two types of important data in cancer prognosis modeling and into lung cancer overall survival.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.