BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Sanguo Zhang

Sanguo Zhang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
MethodologyApplicationseess.IVQuantitative Methods

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Histopathological imaging features- versus molecular measurements-based cancer prognosis modeling

For most if not all cancers, prognosis is of significant importance, and extensive modeling research has been conducted. With the genetic nature of cancer, in the past two decades, multiple types of molecular data (such as gene expressions and DNA mutations) have been explored. More recently, histopathological imaging data, which is routinely collected in biopsy, has been shown as informative for modeling prognosis. In this study, using the TCGA LUAD and LUSC data as a showcase, we examine and compare modeling lung cancer overall survival using gene expressions versus histopathological imaging features. High-dimensional regularization methods are adopted for estimation and selection. Our analysis shows that gene expressions have slightly better prognostic performance. In addition, most of the gene expressions are found to be weakly correlated imaging features. It is expected that this study can provide some insight into utilizing the two types of important data in cancer prognosis modeling and into lung cancer overall survival.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions with A Least Relative Error Approach

For complex diseases, the interactions between genetic and environmental risk factors can have important implications beyond the main effects. Many of the existing interaction analyses conduct marginal analysis and cannot accommodate the joint effects of multiple main effects and interactions. In this study, we conduct joint analysis which can simultaneously accommodate a large number of effects. Significantly different from the existing studies, we adopt loss functions based on relative errors, which offer a useful alternative to the "classic" methods such as the least squares and least absolute deviation. Further to accommodate censoring in the response variable, we adopt a weighted approach. Penalization is used for identification and regularized estimation. Computationally, we develop an effective algorithm which combines the majorize-minimization and coordinate descent. Simulation shows that the proposed approach has satisfactory performance. We also analyze lung cancer prognosis data with gene expression measurements.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A Robust Approach for Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions for Prognosis

For many complex diseases, prognosis is of essential importance. It has been shown that, beyond the main effects of genetic (G) and environmental (E) risk factors, the gene-environment (G$\times$E) interactions also play a critical role. In practice, the prognosis outcome data can be contaminated, and most of the existing methods are not robust to data contamination. In the literature, it has been shown that even a single contaminated observation can lead to severely biased model estimation. In this study, we describe prognosis using an accelerated failure time (AFT) model. An exponential squared loss is proposed to accommodate possible data contamination. A penalization approach is adopted for regularized estimation and marker selection. The proposed method is realized using an effective coordinate descent (CD) and minorization maximization (MM) algorithm. Simulation shows that without contamination, the proposed method has performance comparable to or better than the unrobust alternative. With contamination, it outperforms the unrobust alternative and, under certain scenarios, can be superior to the robust method based on quantile regression. The proposed method is applied to the analysis of TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) lung cancer data. It identifies interactions different from those using the alternatives. The identified marker have important implications and satisfactory stability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Penalized integrative analysis under the accelerated failure time model

For survival data with high-dimensional covariates, results generated in the analysis of a single dataset are often unsatisfactory because of the small sample size. Integrative analysis pools raw data from multiple independent studies with comparable designs, effectively increases sample size, and has better performance than meta-analysis and single-dataset analysis. In this study, we conduct integrative analysis of survival data under the accelerated failure time (AFT) model. The sparsity structures of multiple datasets are described using the homogeneity and heterogeneity models. For variable selection under the homogeneity model, we adopt group penalization approaches. For variable selection under the heterogeneity model, we use composite penalization and sparse group penalization approaches. As a major advancement from the existing studies, the asymptotic selection and estimation properties are rigorously established. Simulation study is conducted to compare different penalization methods and against alternatives. We also analyze four lung cancer prognosis datasets with gene expression measurements.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Promoting Similarity of Sparsity Structures in Integrative Analysis with Penalization

For data with high-dimensional covariates but small to moderate sample sizes, the analysis of single datasets often generates unsatisfactory results. The integrative analysis of multiple independent datasets provides an effective way of pooling information and outperforms single-dataset analysis and some alternative multi-datasets approaches including meta-analysis. Under certain scenarios, multiple datasets are expected to share common important covariates, that is, the multiple models have similarity in sparsity structures. However, the existing methods do not have a mechanism to {\it promote} the similarity of sparsity structures in integrative analysis. In this study, we consider penalized variable selection and estimation in integrative analysis. We develop an $L_0$-penalty based approach, which is the first to explicitly promote the similarity of sparsity structures. Computationally it is realized using a coordinate descent algorithm. Theoretically it has the much desired consistency properties. In simulation, it significantly outperforms the competing alternative when the models in multiple datasets share common important covariates. It has better or similar performance as the alternative when the sparsity structures share no similarity. Thus it provides a "safe" choice for data analysis. Applying the proposed method to three lung cancer datasets with gene expression measurements leads to models with significantly more similar sparsity structures and better prediction performance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access