Paper detail

Higher order monotonicity and submodularity of influence in social networks: from local to global

Kempe, Kleinberg and Tardos (KKT) proposed the following conjecture about the general threshold model in social networks: local monotonicity and submodularity imply global monotonicity and submodularity. That is, if the threshold function of every node is monotone and submodular, then the spread function $σ(S)$ is monotone and submodular, where $S$ is a seed set and the spread function $σ(S)$ denotes the expected number of active nodes at termination of a diffusion process starting from $S$. The correctness of this conjecture has been proved by Mossel and Roch. In this paper, we first provide the concept AD-k (Alternating Difference-$k$) as a generalization of monotonicity and submodularity. Specifically, a set function $f$ is called \adk if all the $\ell$-th order differences of $f$ on all inputs have sign $(-1)^{\ell+1}$ for every $\ell\leq k$. Note that AD-1 corresponds to monotonicity and AD-2 corresponds to monotonicity and submodularity. We propose a refined version of KKT's conjecture: in the general threshold model, local AD-k implies global AD-k. The original KKT conjecture corresponds to the case for AD-2, and the case for AD-1 is the trivial one of local monotonicity implying global monotonicity. By utilizing continuous extensions of set functions as well as social graph constructions, we prove the correctness of our conjecture when the social graph is a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Furthermore, we affirm our conjecture on general social graphs when $k=\infty$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.