Paper detail

Higher order corrections to bound state energy levels in QED: an effective field theory approach

In T.Zhang, L.Xiao and R.Koniuk, Can. J. Phys. {\bf 70}, 670 (1992), a new method was developed to calculate energy levels in QED nonrelativistic bound states, up to order m α^5. Whether or not this method could be used beyond this order was left as an open question. In this paper, we answer this question with the help of a nonrelativistic effective field theory, NRQED. We find that, aside from infrared terms which had to be discarded without justification in Zhang et al, the order m α^4 and m α^5 calculations give the same results in both methods. It is shown, however, that this is due to the special physical origin of these contributions and that the method of Zhang et al would not give the right answer at order m α^6 or higher. The separation of scale provided by NRQED is essential to the derivation of this result.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.