Source author record

Patrick Labelle

Patrick Labelle appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint1996arXiv

Derivation of the Lamb Shift using an Effective Field Theory

We rederive the $O(α^5)$ shift of the hydrogen levels in the non-recoil ($m_e/m_P \to 0$) limit using Nonrelativistic QED (NRQED), an effective field theory developed by Caswell and Lepage (Phys. Lett. 167B, 437 (1986)). Our result contains the Lamb shift as a special case. Our calculation is far simpler than traditional approaches and has the advantage of being systematic. It also clearly illustrates the need to renormalize (or ``match'') the coefficients of the effective theory beyond tree level.

preprint1994arXiv

Higher order corrections to bound state energy levels in QED: an effective field theory approach

In T.Zhang, L.Xiao and R.Koniuk, Can. J. Phys. {\bf 70}, 670 (1992), a new method was developed to calculate energy levels in QED nonrelativistic bound states, up to order m α^5. Whether or not this method could be used beyond this order was left as an open question. In this paper, we answer this question with the help of a nonrelativistic effective field theory, NRQED. We find that, aside from infrared terms which had to be discarded without justification in Zhang et al, the order m α^4 and m α^5 calculations give the same results in both methods. It is shown, however, that this is due to the special physical origin of these contributions and that the method of Zhang et al would not give the right answer at order m α^6 or higher. The separation of scale provided by NRQED is essential to the derivation of this result.