Paper detail

Higher Criticism Tuned Regression For Weak And Sparse Signals

Here we propose a novel searching scheme for a tuning parameter in high-dimensional penalized regression methods to address variable selection and modeling when sample sizes are limited compared to the data dimensions. Our method is motivated by high-throughput biological data such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS). We propose a new estimate of the regularization parameter $λ$ in penalized regression methods based on an estimated lower bound of the proportion of false null hypotheses with confidence $(1 - α)$. The bound is estimated by applying the empirical null distribution of the higher criticism statistic, a second-level significance test constructed by dependent $p$-values using a multi-split regression and aggregation method. A tuning parameter estimate in penalized regression, $λ$, corresponds with the lower bound of the proportion of false null hypotheses. Different penalized regression methods with varied signal sparsity and strength are compared in the multi-split method setting. We demonstrate the performance of our method using both simulation experiments and the applications of real data on (1) lipid-trait genetics from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) clinical trial and (2) epigenetic analysis evaluating smoking's influence in differential methylation in the Agricultural Lung Health Study. The proposed algorithm is included in the HCTR package, available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/HCTR/index.html.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.