Paper detail

High-throughput analysis of Fröhlich-type polaron models

The electronic structure of condensed matter can be significantly affected by the electron-phonon interaction, leading to important phenomena such as electrical resistance, superconductivity or the formation of polarons. This interaction is often neglected in band structure calculations but can have a strong impact on band gaps or optical spectra. Commonly used frameworks for electron-phonon energy corrections are the Allen-Heine-Cardona theory and the Fröhlich model. While the latter shows qualitative agreement with experiment for many polar materials, its simplicity should bring hard limits to its applicability in real materials. Improvements can be made by introducing a generalized version of the model, which considers anisotropic and degenerate electronic bands, and multiple phonon branches. In this work, we search for trends and outliers on over a thousand materials in existing databases of phonon and electron band structures. We use our results to identify the limits of applicability of the standard Frölich model by comparing to the generalized version, and by testing its basic hypothesis of a large radius for the polaronic wavefunction and the corresponding atomic displacement cloud. Among our extended set of materials, most exhibit large polaron behavior as well as validity of the perturbative treatment. For the valence band, there is also a significant fraction of the materials for which the perturbative treatment cannot be applied and/or for which the size of the self-trapping region is close to the atomic repetition distance. We find a large variety of behaviors, and employ much more accurate, fully ab initio Allen-Heine-Cardona calculations to understand extreme cases, where the Fröhlich model should fail and unusually large zero-point renormalization energies occur.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.