Paper detail

High-precision estimate of the hydrodynamic radius for self-avoiding walks

The universal asymptotic amplitude ratio between the gyration radius and the hydrodynamic radius of self-avoiding walks is estimated by high-resolution Monte Carlo simulations. By studying chains of length of up to $N = 2^{25} \approx 34 \times 10^6$ monomers, we find that the ratio takes the value $R_{\mathrm{G}}/R_{\mathrm{H}} = 1.5803940(45)$, which is several orders of magnitude more accurate than the previous state of the art. This is facilitated by a sampling scheme which is quite general, and which allows for the efficient estimation of averages of a large class of observables. The competing corrections to scaling for the hydrodynamic radius are clearly discernible. We also find improved estimates for other universal properties that measure the chain dimension. In particular, a method of analysis which eliminates the leading correction to scaling results in a highly accurate estimate for the Flory exponent of $ν= 0.58759700(40)$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.