Paper detail

High-numerical-aperture and long-working-distance objectives for single-atom experiments

We present two long-working-distance objective lenses with numerical apertures (NA) of 0.29 and 0.4 for single-atom experiments. The objective lenses are assembled entirely by the commercial on-catalog $Φ$1'' singlets. Both the objectives are capable to correct the spherical aberrations due to the standard flat vacuum glass windows with various thickness. The working distances of NA$=0.29$ and NA$=0.4$ objectives are 34.6 mm and 18.2 mm, respectively, at the design wavelength of 852 nm with 5-mm thick silica window. In addition, the objectives can also be optimized to work at diffraction limit at single wavelength in the entire visible and near infrared regions by slightly tuning the distance between the first two lenses. The diffraction limited fields of view for NA$=0.29$ and NA$=0.4$ objectives are 0.62 mm and 0.61 mm, and the spatial resolutions are 1.8 $μ$m and 1.3 $μ$m at the design wavelength. The performances are simulated by the commercial ray-tracing software and confirmed by imaging the resolution chart and a 1.18 $μ$m pinhole. The two objectives can be used for trapping and manipulating single atoms of various species.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.