Paper detail

High-Dimensional Semiparametric Selection Models: Estimation Theory with an Application to the Retail Gasoline Market

This paper proposes a multi-stage projection-based Lasso procedure for the semiparametric sample selection model in high-dimensional settings under a weak nonparametric restriction on the selection correction. In particular, the number of regressors in the main equation, p, and the number of regressors in the selection equation, d, can grow with and exceed the sample size n. The analysis considers the exact sparsity case and the approximate sparsity case. The main theoretical results are finite-sample bounds from which sufficient scaling conditions on the sample size for estimation consistency and variable-selection consistency are established. Statistical efficiency of the proposed estimators is studied via lower bounds on minimax risks and the result shows that, for a family of models with exactly sparse structure on the coefficient vector in the main equation, one of the proposed estimators attains the smallest estimation error up to the (n,d,p)-scaling among a class of procedures in worst-case scenarios. Inference procedures for the coefficients of the main equation, one based on a pivotal Dantzig selector to construct non-asymptotic confidence sets and one based on a post-selection strategy, are discussed. Other theoretical contributions include establishing the non-asymptotic counterpart of the familiar asymptotic oracle results from previous literature: the estimator of the coefficients in the main equation behaves as if the unknown nonparametric component were known, provided the nonparametric component is sufficiently smooth. Small-sample performance of the high-dimensional multi-stage estimation procedure is evaluated by Monte-Carlo simulations and illustrated with an empirical application to the retail gasoline market in the Greater Saint Louis area.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.