Paper detail

High-dimensional GARCH process segmentation with an application to Value-at-Risk

Models for financial risk often assume that underlying asset returns are stationary. However, there is strong evidence that multivariate financial time series entail changes not only in their within-series dependence structure, but also in the cross-sectional dependence among them. In particular, the stressed Value-at-Risk of a portfolio, a popularly adopted measure of market risk, cannot be gauged adequately unless such structural breaks are taken into account in its estimation. We propose a method for consistent detection of multiple change points in high-dimensional GARCH panel data set where both individual GARCH processes and their correlations are allowed to change over time. We prove its consistency in multiple change point estimation, and demonstrate its good performance through simulation studies and an application to the Value-at-Risk problem on a real dataset. Our methodology is implemented in the R package segMGarch, available from CRAN.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.