Paper detail

Hierarchical Multi-Fidelity Learning for Predicting Three-Dimensional Flame Wrinkling and Turbulent Burning Velocity

High-fidelity experimental characterization of turbulent premixed flames remains limited by the cost and complexity of advanced diagnostics, particularly under elevated pressures and intense turbulence where measurements of coupled flame morphology and burning dynamics are sparse. Here, we develop a hierarchical multi-fidelity neural network framework (MuFiNNs) to address this challenge by integrating sparse high-fidelity experimental data with structured low-fidelity representations encoding dominant physical trends. The framework combines hierarchical low-fidelity construction with nonlinear multi-fidelity correction to learn coupled geometric and reactive flame behavior while recovering discrepancies that simplified models alone cannot capture. The methodology is applied to expanding turbulent premixed flames to predict three-dimensional flame wrinkling dynamics and turbulent mass burning velocity across varying fuels, pressures, and turbulence intensities. Using experimentally informed low-fidelity trend models with sparse high-fidelity measurements, MuFiNNs accurately reconstruct observed flame behavior, enable interpolation across unseen operating conditions, and demonstrate robust extrapolation beyond the training domain. Importantly, the framework remains effective in noisy, weakly structured, or experimentally inaccessible regimes where conventional data-driven approaches often fail. These results show that hierarchical multi-fidelity learning provides a scalable and physically grounded strategy for predictive combustion modeling in data-limited regimes. More broadly, this work establishes multi-fidelity scientific machine learning as a practical framework for extracting physically meaningful predictive models from sparse experiments, particularly for instability-dominated and turbulence-sensitive reactive flows where high-fidelity data acquisition is demanding.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.