Paper detail

Hierarchical Low-Rank Approximation of Regularized Wasserstein Distance

Sinkhorn divergence is a measure of dissimilarity between two probability measures. It is obtained through adding an entropic regularization term to Kantorovich's optimal transport problem and can hence be viewed as an entropically regularized Wasserstein distance. Given two discrete probability vectors in the $n$-simplex and supported on two bounded spaces in ${\mathbb R}^d$, we present a fast method for computing Sinkhorn divergence when the cost matrix can be decomposed into a $d$-term sum of asymptotically smooth Kronecker product factors. The method combines Sinkhorn's matrix scaling iteration with a low-rank hierarchical representation of the scaling matrices to achieve a near-linear complexity ${\mathcal O}(n \log^3 n)$. This provides a fast and easy-to-implement algorithm for computing Sinkhorn divergence, enabling its applicability to large-scale optimization problems, where the computation of classical Wasserstein metric is not feasible. We present a numerical example related to signal processing to demonstrate the applicability of quadratic Sinkhorn divergence in comparison with quadratic Wasserstein distance and to verify the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.