Researcher profile

Mohammad Motamed

Mohammad Motamed contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A multi-fidelity neural network surrogate sampling method for uncertainty quantification

We propose a multi-fidelity neural network surrogate sampling method for the uncertainty quantification of physical/biological systems described by ordinary or partial differential equations. We first generate a set of low/high-fidelity data by low/high-fidelity computational models, e.g. using coarser/finer discretizations of the governing differential equations. We then construct a two-level neural network, where a large set of low-fidelity data are utilized in order to accelerate the construction of a high-fidelity surrogate model with a small set of high-fidelity data. We then embed the constructed high-fidelity surrogate model in the framework of Monte Carlo sampling. The proposed algorithm combines the approximation power of neural networks with the advantages of Monte Carlo sampling within a multi-fidelity framework. We present two numerical examples to demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method. We show that dramatic savings in computational cost may be achieved when the output predictions are desired to be accurate within small tolerances.

preprint2020arXiv

Hierarchical Low-Rank Approximation of Regularized Wasserstein Distance

Sinkhorn divergence is a measure of dissimilarity between two probability measures. It is obtained through adding an entropic regularization term to Kantorovich's optimal transport problem and can hence be viewed as an entropically regularized Wasserstein distance. Given two discrete probability vectors in the $n$-simplex and supported on two bounded spaces in ${\mathbb R}^d$, we present a fast method for computing Sinkhorn divergence when the cost matrix can be decomposed into a $d$-term sum of asymptotically smooth Kronecker product factors. The method combines Sinkhorn's matrix scaling iteration with a low-rank hierarchical representation of the scaling matrices to achieve a near-linear complexity ${\mathcal O}(n \log^3 n)$. This provides a fast and easy-to-implement algorithm for computing Sinkhorn divergence, enabling its applicability to large-scale optimization problems, where the computation of classical Wasserstein metric is not feasible. We present a numerical example related to signal processing to demonstrate the applicability of quadratic Sinkhorn divergence in comparison with quadratic Wasserstein distance and to verify the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method.

preprint2010arXiv

Taylor Expansion and Discretization Errors in Gaussian Beam Superposition

The Gaussian beam superposition method is an asymptotic method for computing high frequency wave fields in smoothly varying inhomogeneous media. In this paper we study the accuracy of the Gaussian beam superposition method and derive error estimates related to the discretization of the superposition integral and the Taylor expansion of the phase and amplitude off the center of the beam. We show that in the case of odd order beams, the error is smaller than a simple analysis would indicate because of error cancellation effects between the beams. Since the cancellation happens only when odd order beams are used, there is no remarkable gain in using even order beams. Moreover, applying the error estimate to the problem with constant speed of propagation, we show that in this case the local beam width is not a good indicator of accuracy, and there is no direct relation between the error and the beam width. We present numerical examples to verify the error estimates.