Paper detail

HiCOPS: High Performance Computing Framework for Tera-Scale Database Search of Mass Spectrometry based Omics Data

Database-search algorithms, that deduce peptides from Mass Spectrometry (MS) data, have tried to improve the computational efficiency to accomplish larger, and more complex systems biology studies. Existing serial, and high-performance computing (HPC) search engines, otherwise highly successful, are known to exhibit poor-scalability with increasing size of theoretical search-space needed for increased complexity of modern non-model, multi-species MS-based omics analysis. Consequently, the bottleneck for computational techniques is the communication costs of moving the data between hierarchy of memory, or processing units, and not the arithmetic operations. This post-Moore change in architecture, and demands of modern systems biology experiments have dampened the overall effectiveness of the existing HPC workflows. We present a novel efficient parallel computational method, and its implementation on memory-distributed architectures for peptide identification tool called HiCOPS, that enables more than 100-fold improvement in speed over most existing HPC proteome database search tools. HiCOPS empowers the supercomputing database search concept for comprehensive identification of peptides, and all their modified forms within a reasonable time-frame. We demonstrate this by searching Gigabytes of experimental MS data against Terabytes of databases where HiCOPS completes peptide identification in few minutes using 72 parallel nodes (1728 cores) compared to several weeks required by existing state-of-the-art tools using 1 node (24 cores); 100 minutes vs 5 weeks; 500x speedup. Finally, we formulate a theoretical framework for our overhead-avoiding strategy, and report superior performance evaluation results for key metrics including execution time, CPU utilization, speedups, and I/O efficiency. The software will be made available at: hicops.github.io

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.