Paper detail

Heterogeneous multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for gold nanoparticle radiosensitization

To introduce the heterogeneous multiscale (HetMS) model for Monte Carlo simulations of gold nanoparticle dose-enhanced radiation therapy (GNPT), a model characterized by its varying levels of detail on different length scales within a single phantom; to apply the HetMS model in two different scenarios relevant for GNPT and to compare computed results with others published. The HetMS model is implemented in EGSnrc; the code is tested via comparisons with published data from independent gold nanoparticle (GNP) simulations. Two distinct scenarios for the HetMS model are considered: (1) monoenergetic photon beams incident on a large cylinder; (2) isotropic point source at the center of a large sphere with GNPs diffusing from the center. Dose enhancement factors (DEFs) are compared for different source energies, depths, gold concentrations, GNP sizes, and modeling assumptions. Simulation efficiencies are investigated. The HetMS MC simulations account for the competing effects of photon fluence perturbation coupled with enhanced local energy deposition. DEFs are most sensitive to these effects for lower source energies, varying with distance from the source; DEFs below unity can occur at energies relevant for brachytherapy. Compared to discrete modeling of GNPs throughout the gold-containing volume, efficiencies are enhanced by up to a factor of 122 with the HetMS approach. For the spherical phantom, DEFs vary with time for diffusion, radionuclide, and radius. By combining geometric models of varying complexity on different length scales within a single simulation, the HetMS model can effectively account for both macroscopic and microscopic effects. Efficiency gains with the HetMS approach enable diverse calculations which would otherwise be prohibitively long. The HetMS model may be extended to diverse scenarios relevant for GNPT, providing further avenues for research and development.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.