Paper detail

Heterodimer binding scaffolds recognition via the analysis of kinetically hot residues

Physical interactions between proteins are often difficult to decipher. The aim of this paper is to present an algorithm designed to recognize binding patches and supporting structural scaffolds of interacting heterodimer protein chains using the Gaussian Network Model (GNM). The recognition is based on the (self)adjustable identification of kinetically hot residues, i.e., residues with highest contributions to the weighted sum of fastest modes per chain extracted via GNM, and their connection to possible binding scaffolds. The algorithm adjusts the number of modes used in the GNM's weighted sum calculation using the ratio of predicted and expected numbers of target residues (contact and first layer residues). This approach produces very good results when applied to chains forming heterodimers, especially with dimers with high chain length ratios. The protocol's ability to recognize near native decoys was compared to the ability of the statistical potential of Lu and Skolnick using the Sternberg and Vakser decoy dimers sets. The statistical potential produced better overall results, but in a number of cases its predicting ability was comparable, or even worse than the ability of the adjustable GNM approach. The results presented in this paper suggest that in heterodimers, at least one partnering chain has interacting scaffold determined by the immovable kinetically hot residues. In many cases interacting chains (especially if being of noticeably different sizes), either behave as rigid lock and key, or exhibit opposite dynamic behaviors. While the binding surface of one of the chains is rigid and stable, its partner's interacting scaffold is more flexible and adaptable. Authors note: The approach described here was initially given as a rough draft in 2013 [1]. The next manuscript will describe the behavior of protein dimers incorrectly characterized with the present approach.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.