Paper detail

Helium effects and bubbles formation in irradiated Ti3SiC2

Ti3SiC2 is a potential structural material for nuclear reactor applications. However, He irradiation effects in this material are not well understood, especially at high temperatures. Here, we compare the effects of He irradiation in Ti3SiC2 at room temperature (RT) and at 750 °C. Irradiation at 750 °C was found to lead to extremely elongated He bubbles that are concentrated in the nano-laminate layers of Ti3SiC2, whereas the overall crystal structure of the material remained intact. In contrast, at RT, the layered structure was significantly damaged and highly disordered after irradiation. Our study reveals that at elevated temperatures, the unique structure of Ti3SiC2 can accommodate large amounts of He atoms in the nano-laminate layer, without compromising the structural stability of the material. The structure and the mechanical tests results show that the irradiation induced swelling and hardening at 750 °C are much smaller than those at RT. These results indicate that Ti3SiC2 has an excellent resistance to accumulation of radiation-induced He impurities and that it has a considerable tolerance to irradiation-induced degradation of mechanical properties at high temperatures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.