Paper detail

Helical turbulent Prandtl number in the $A$ model of passive advection: Two loop approximation

Using the field theoretic renormalization group technique in the two-loop approximation, turbulent Prandtl numbers are obtained in the general $A$ model of passive vector advected by fully developed turbulent velocity field with violation of spatial parity introduced via continuous parameter $ρ$ ranging from $ρ=0$ (no violation of spatial parity) to $|ρ|=1$ (maximum violation of spatial parity). In non-helical environments, we demonstrate that $A$ is restricted to $-1.723 \leq A \leq 2.800$ (rounded on the last presented digit) due to the constraints of two-loop calculations. When $ρ>0.749$ restrictions may be removed. Furthermore, three physically important cases $A \in \{-1, 0, 1\}$ are shown to lie deep within the allowed interval of $A$ for all values of $ρ$. For the model of linearized Navier-Stokes equations ($A = -1$) up to date unknown helical values of turbulent Prandtl number have been shown to equal $1$ regardless of parity violation. Furthermore, we have shown that interaction parameter $A$ exerts strong influence on advection diffusion processes in turbulent environments with broken spatial parity. In explicit, depending on actual value of $A$ turbulent Prandtl number may increase or decrease with $ρ$. By varying $A$ continuously we explain high stability of kinematic MHD model ($A=1$) against helical effects as a result of its closeness to $A = 0.912$ (rounded on the last presented digit) case where helical effects are completely suppressed. Contrary, for the physically important $A=0$ model we show that it lies deep within the interval of models where helical effects cause the turbulent Prandtl number to decrease with $|ρ|$. We thus identify internal structure of interactions given by parameter $A$, and not the vector character of the admixture itself to be the dominant factor influencing diffusion advection processes in the helical $A$ model.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.