Paper detail

Height distributions in interface growth: The role of the averaging process

To quantitatively characterize height distributions (HDs), one uses adimensional ratios of their first central moments ($m_n$) or cumulants ($κ_n$), especially the skewness $S$ and kurtosis $K$, whose accurate estimate demands an averaging over all $L^d$ points of the height profile at a given time, in translation-invariant interfaces, and over $N$ independent samples. One way of doing this is by calculating $m_n(t)$ [or $κ_n(t)$] for each sample and then carrying out an average of them for the $N$ interfaces, with $S$ and $K$ being calculated only at the end. Another approach consists in directly calculating the ratios for each interface and, then, averaging the $N$ values. It turns out, however, that $S$ and $K$ for the growth regime HDs display strong finite-size and -time effects when estimated from these "interface statistics", as already observed in some previous works and clearly shown here, through extensive simulations of several discrete growth models belonging to the EW and KPZ classes on 1D and 2D substrates of sizes $L=const.$ and $L \sim t$. Importantly, I demonstrate that with "1-point statistics'', i.e., by calculating $m_n(t)$ [or $κ_n(t)$] once for all $N L^d$ heights together, these corrections become very weak. However, I find that this "1-point'' approach fails in uncovering the universality of the HDs in the steady state regime (SSR) of systems whose average height, $\bar{h}$, is a fluctuating variable. In fact, as demonstrated here, in this regime the 1-pt height evolves as $h(t) = \bar{h}(t) + s_λ A^{1/2} L^α ζ+ \cdots$ -- where $P(ζ)$ is the underlying SSR HD -- and the fluctuations in $\bar{h}$ yield $S_{1pt} \sim t^{-1/2}$ and $K_{1pt} \sim t^{-1}$. Nonetheless, by analyzing $P(h-\bar{h})$, the cumulants of $P(ζ)$ can be accurately determined.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.