Paper detail

Heat transport by turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection for $\Pra\ \simeq 0.8$ and $4\times 10^{11} \alt \Ra\ \alt 2\times10^{14}$: Ultimate-state transition for aspect ratio $Γ= 1.00$

We report experimental results for heat-transport measurements by turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection in a cylindrical sample of aspect ratio $Γ\equiv D/L = 1.00$ ($D = 1.12$ m is the diameter and $L = 1.12$ m the height). They are for the Rayleigh-number range $4\times10^{11} \alt \Ra \alt 2\times10^{14}$ and for Prandtl numbers \Pra\ between 0.79 and 0.86. For $\Ra < \Ra^*_1 \simeq 2\times 10^{13}$ we find $\Nu = N_0 \Ra^{γ_{eff}}$ with $γ_{eff} = 0.321 \pm 0.002$ and $N_0 = 0.0776$, consistent with classical turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection in a system with laminar boundary layers below the top and above the bottom plate and with the prediction of Grossmann and Lohse. For $\Ra > \Ra_1^*$ the data rise above the classical-state power-law and show greater scatter. In analogy to similar behavior observed for $Γ= 0.50$, we interpret this observation as the onset of the transition to the ultimate state. Within our resolution this onset occurs at nearly the same value of $\Ra_1^*$ as it does for $Γ= 0.50$. This differs from an earlier estimate by Roche {\it et al.} which yielded a transition at $\Ra_U \simeq 1.3\times 10^{11} Γ^{-2.5\pm 0.5}$. A $Γ$-independent $\Ra^*_1$ would suggest that the boundary-layer shear transition is induced by fluctuations on a scale less than the sample dimensions rather than by a global $Γ$-dependent flow mode. Within the resolution of the measurements the heat transport above $\Ra_1^*$ is equal for the two $Γ$ values, suggesting a universal aspect of the ultimate-state transition and properties. The enhanced scatter of \Nu\ in the transition region, which exceeds the experimental resolution, indicates an intrinsic irreproducibility of the state of the system.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.