Paper detail

Harish-Chandra Theorem for Two-parameter Quantum Groups

This paper is devoted to investigating the centre of two-parameter quantum groups $U_{r,s}(\mathfrak{g})$ via establishing the Harish-Chandra homomorphism. Based on the Rosso form and the representation theory of weight modules, we prove that when rank $\mathfrak{g}$ is even, the Harish-Chandra homomorphism is an isomorphism, and in particular, the centre of the quantum group $\breve{U}_{r,s}(\mathfrak{g})$ of the weight lattice type is a polynomial algebra $\mathbb{K}[z_{\varpi_1},\cdots,z_{\varpi_n}]$, where canonical central elements $z_λ\; (λ\in Λ^+)$ are turned out to be uniformly expressed. For rank $\mathfrak{g}$ to be odd, we figure out a new invertible extra central generator $z_*$, which doesn't survive in $U_q(\mathfrak g)$, then the centre of $\breve{U}_{r,s}(\mathfrak{g})$ contains $\mathbb{K}[z_{\varpi_1},\cdots,z_{\varpi_n}]\otimes_\mathbb K\mathbb K[z_*^{\frac{1}{\ell}}, z_*^{-\frac{1}{\ell}}]$, where $\ell=2$, except $\ell=4$ for $D_{2k+1}$.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.