Paper detail

Hardness of T-carbon: Density functional theory calculations

We revisit and interpret the mechanical properties of the recently proposed allotrope of carbon, T-carbon [Sheng \emph{et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett., \textbf{106}, 155703 (2011)], using density functional theory in combination with different empirical hardness models. In contrast with the early estimation based on the Gao's model, which attributes to T-carbon an high Vickers hardness of 61 GPa comparable to that of superhard cubic boron nitride (\emph{c}-BN), we find that T-carbon is not a superhard material, since its Vickers hardenss does not exceed 10 GPa. Besides providing clear evidence for the absence of superhardenss in T-carbon, we discuss the physical reasons behind the failure of Gao's and Šim$\rm\mathring{u}$nek and Vackář's (SV) models in predicting the hardness of T-carbon, residing on their improper treatment of the highly anisotropic distribution of quasi-\emph{sp}$^3$-like C-C hybrids. A possible remedy to the Gao and SV models based on the concept of superatom is suggest, which indeed yields a Vickers hardness of about 8 GPa.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.