Paper detail

Hard sphere fluids confined between soft repulsive walls: A comparative study using Monte Carlo and density functional methods

Hard-sphere fluids confined between parallel plates a distance $D$ apart are studied for a wide range of packing fractions, including also the onset of crystallization, applying Monte Carlo simulation techniques and density functional theory. The walls repel the hard spheres (of diameter $σ$) with a Weeks-Chandler-Andersen (WCA) potential $V_{WCA}(z) = 4 ε[(σ_w/z)^{12}-(σ_w/z)^6 + 1/4]$, with range $σ_w = σ/2$. We vary the strength $ε$ over a wide range and the case of simple hard walls is also treated for comparison. By the variation of $ε$ one can change both the surface excess packing fraction and the wall-fluid $(γ_{wf})$ and wall-crystal $(γ_{wc})$ surface free energies. Several different methods to extract $γ_{wf}$ and $γ_{wc}$ from Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are implemented, and their accuracy and efficiency is comparatively discussed. The density functional theory (DFT) using Fundamental Measure functionals is found to be quantitatively accurate over a wide range of packing fractions; small deviations between DFT and MC near the fluid to crystal transition need to be studied further. Our results on density profiles near soft walls could be useful to interpret corresponding experiments with suitable colloidal dispersions.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.