Paper detail

Handover-Count based Velocity Estimation of Cellular-Connected UAVs

Cellular-connected unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are expected to play a major role in various civilian and commercial applications in the future. While existing cellular networks can provide wireless coverage to UAV user equipment (UE), such legacy networks are optimized for ground users which makes it challenging to provide reliable connectivity to aerial UEs. To ensure reliable and effective mobility management for aerial UEs, estimating the velocity of cellular-connected UAVs carries critical importance. In this paper, we introduce an approximate probability mass function (PMF) of handover count (HOC) for different UAV velocities and different ground base station (GBS) densities. Afterward, we derive the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for the velocity estimate of a UAV, and also provide a simple unbiased estimator for the UAV's velocity which depends on the GBS density and HOC measurement time. Our simulation results show that the accuracy of velocity estimation increases with the GBS density and HOC measurement window. Moreover, the velocity of commercially available UAVs can be estimated efficiently with reasonable accuracy.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.